ROPPRÖÖKURITE KAKLUSKLUBI

[Külaline]

Jumala head teemad aruteludeks on pakutud ju, mul oleks päris mitmel teemal üht-teist öelda!
Minu pakkumine - kas pidevas depressioonis inimene peaks perekonna looma või üldse kaaslast otsima?

[Külaline]

Jumala head teemad aruteludeks on pakutud ju, mul oleks päris mitmel teemal üht-teist öelda!
Minu pakkumine - kas pidevas depressioonis inimene peaks perekonna looma või üldse kaaslast otsima?

Ütle! Pane aga oma arvamused ritta.
Ja vastuseks sinu küsimusele - Kindlasti mitte! Milleks veel teist inimest tõmmata sellisesse ellu, kus iseendagagi hakkama ei saada. Kõige vastutustundetum oleks veel lapsi saada sellisel inimesel.

[Külaline]

[/quote]

Meestevihkajast edukas, ilus, tark ja tore keskealine naine kes iga aastaga aina nooremaks läheb on ka siia oma vaimukusi loopima tulnud. Koos oma klooniga. Tema ei valeta. Tema teeb pisivalesid kui midagi kirjutab. Aga see on täpselt sinu ja sinu klooni kelelga te kahekesi üksteise võidu pöial alla nuppu tallate.
Varsti tuleb ka toimetuletuste raha ja sul tuju hea. Onju
[/quote]

And the most obvious trolling award goes to….
[/quote]

Vihkan. Õigemini põlastan selliseid "intelligendikesi" kes kõikjale topivad inglise keelseiod sõnu või lausa lauseid. Peavad oma inglise keele oskust nagu mingi näitajaks mis tõstab neid teistest kõrgemale. Huvitav miks trollimise auhind sulle ei võiks minnà? Õige. Sa toodad ju ainult lolli ja labast teksti.

[Külaline]

Meestevihkajast edukas, ilus, tark ja tore keskealine naine kes iga aastaga aina nooremaks läheb on ka siia oma vaimukusi loopima tulnud. Koos oma klooniga. Tema ei valeta. Tema teeb pisivalesid kui midagi kirjutab. Aga see on täpselt sinu ja sinu klooni kelelga te kahekesi üksteise võidu pöial alla nuppu tallate.
Varsti tuleb ka toimetuletuste raha ja sul tuju hea. Onju
[/quote]

And the most obvious trolling award goes to….
[/quote]

Vihkan. Õigemini põlastan selliseid "intelligendikesi" kes kõikjale topivad inglise keelseiod sõnu või lausa lauseid. Peavad oma inglise keele oskust nagu mingi näitajaks mis tõstab neid teistest kõrgemale. Huvitav miks trollimise auhind sulle ei võiks minnà? Õige. Sa toodad ju ainult lolli ja labast teksti.
[/quote]

Oh no, has my radar detected a….triggered female specimen? Yes my english is very advanced, thank you for noticing. Obviously knowing english makes me elite, doesnt matter that most of the world speaks it, a simple country girl will be impressed by average things others wouldnt dream of being impressed by. To her, those things are impressive and it says a lot about her

[Külaline]

Vihkan. Õigemini põlastan selliseid "intelligendikesi" kes kõikjale topivad inglise keelseiod sõnu või lausa lauseid. Peavad oma inglise keele oskust nagu mingi näitajaks mis tõstab neid teistest kõrgemale. Huvitav miks trollimise auhind sulle ei võiks minnà? Õige. Sa toodad ju ainult lolli ja labast teksti.

Suck it up, Susie! Elu ongi kirju ja siin teemas oled õiges kohas, pritsi oma lolli ja labast teksti nagu torust tuleb.

[Külaline]

Teil on mõlemal tsiteerimisega mingi probleem või on tegu "ise küsin- ise vastan" situatsiooniga?

[Külaline]

Jumala head teemad aruteludeks on pakutud ju, mul oleks päris mitmel teemal üht-teist öelda!
Minu pakkumine - kas pidevas depressioonis inimene peaks perekonna looma või üldse kaaslast otsima?

Ütle! Pane aga oma arvamused ritta.
Ja vastuseks sinu küsimusele - Kindlasti mitte! Milleks veel teist inimest tõmmata sellisesse ellu, kus iseendagagi hakkama ei saada. Kõige vastutustundetum oleks veel lapsi saada sellisel inimesel.

Näh, nii ei tule mingit kismat. Ma olen nõus.

[Külaline]

Kõik need, kes siiralt tunnevad, et neil hästi ja nad õnnelikud ja lapsed ka, neil on vedanud, kuid siiski ei tasuks ülbeks minna, vaid olla tänulik, et nii on läinud. Tihtipeale inimesed tahavad rohkem või muutuvad ülbeks ja kannatama peavad seda siis teised, nt lastetud, kes neid probleeme kuulama peavad.

[Külaline]

Meestevihkajast edukas, ilus, tark ja tore keskealine naine kes iga aastaga aina nooremaks läheb on ka siia oma vaimukusi loopima tulnud. Koos oma klooniga. Tema ei valeta. Tema teeb pisivalesid kui midagi kirjutab. Aga see on täpselt sinu ja sinu klooni kelelga te kahekesi üksteise võidu pöial alla nuppu tallate.
Varsti tuleb ka toimetuletuste raha ja sul tuju hea. Onju
[/quote]

And the most obvious trolling award goes to….
[/quote]

Vihkan. Õigemini põlastan selliseid "intelligendikesi" kes kõikjale topivad inglise keelseiod sõnu või lausa lauseid. Peavad oma inglise keele oskust nagu mingi näitajaks mis tõstab neid teistest kõrgemale. Huvitav miks trollimise auhind sulle ei võiks minnà? Õige. Sa toodad ju ainult lolli ja labast teksti.
[/quote]

Ma arvan, et soov inglise keelt rääkida on lihtsalt selline soov. Kunagi läksin oma sõbrannaga kusagile ja mul oli kombeks rääkida inglise-eesti segakeelt, tegelikult juba varasest noorusest saati. Lisaks tänapäeva noored räägivadki juba väga head inglise keelt, pigem on vanema otsa inimesed nö haruldus, kui räägivad ingl. keelt. Ingl. k. kasutamine argiselt on inimese imidz, tema olemus, see kõneleb temast. Nagu need pered, kus räägitakse eesti-vene keelt ntx. Samuti praktiseerides kasvab ka hääldus- jmt. oskus.

PS, pole tsiteeritu.

[Külaline]

Ahjaa, tahtsin lisada, et sõbrannat see häiris väga, aga ma austasin tema soovi muidugi. Nüüd valin väga, kellega ja kus ingl. k suhtlen. Seega soovitan siinsele ingl. k kasutajale samuti otsida nö sobiv keskkond selleks, sest paraku on tõesti tobe, kui väga erinevad inimesed üritavad saagi käima tõmmata, et siis mingi posit. tulemus saada (puu maha võtta) (mitte neg., saag=kisma). Paraku on siiski nö autsaider see, kes erineb. Kuid keelte õpe on siiski oluline (iseendale). Äkki see annab mingi moti inimesele, et äkki õpiks ka.

[Külaline]

Minu arust on see väga tore, kui inimene oskab keeli. Aga sellegipoolest tundub tobe pudistada mingit eesti-inglise segakeelt. Inglise keelt hakata eestikeelses seltskonnas heast peast rääkima on ka tobe. Aga eriti tobe on see, kui need väljendid ja keel on veel ka vigased.

[Külaline]

Postitus on kustutatud

Õõõ krai mii ä rivär. I love to annoy you with the usage of the english language. You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me. Don’t they say, jealousy is the highest form of admoration? And darling, posessing english skills is noy anything to show off. For most of the world its as much showing off as boiling an egg. Jusy for you, its impressive. Think about why you consider such simple things to “show off”. Its very weird to be honest

[Külaline]

See lollakas kes siin oma inglise keelega eputab on tavaline tõusikust mats. Selline saamatu ja äpu reaalses elus, aga näe kelle õppis selgeks ja eputab sellega. Millegi muuga ei saa. Loll ja kole.

Õõõ krai mii ä rivär. I love to annoy you with the usage of the english language. You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me. Don’t they say, jealousy is the highest form of admoration? And darling, posessing english skills is noy anything to show off. For most of the world its as much showing off as boiling an egg. Jusy for you, its impressive. Think about why you consider such simple things to “show off”. Its very weird to be honest

Google Translate ei teeks vähemalt nii palju kirjavigu.

[Külaline]

See lollakas kes siin oma inglise keelega eputab on tavaline tõusikust mats. Selline saamatu ja äpu reaalses elus, aga näe kelle õppis selgeks ja eputab sellega. Millegi muuga ei saa. Loll ja kole.

Õõõ krai mii ä rivär. I love to annoy you with the usage of the english language. You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me. Don’t they say, jealousy is the highest form of admoration? And darling, posessing english skills is noy anything to show off. For most of the world its as much showing off as boiling an egg. Jusy for you, its impressive. Think about why you consider such simple things to “show off”. Its very weird to be honest

Google Translate ei teeks vähemalt nii palju kirjavigu.

I don’t give a damn about mistakes. Does miss teacher want me to write a perfect essay for her ? Yes for you, you deserve to be written according to the highest possible standards rofl lmao

[Külaline]

Õõõ krai mii ä rivär. I love to annoy you with the usage of the english language. You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me. Don’t they say, jealousy is the highest form of admoration? And darling, posessing english skills is noy anything to show off. For most of the world its as much showing off as boiling an egg. Jusy for you, its impressive. Think about why you consider such simple things to “show off”. Its very weird to be honest

I don’t give a damn about mistakes. Does miss teacher want me to write a perfect essay for her ? Yes for you, you deserve to be written according to the highest possible standards rofl lmao

Based on the provided text, here's the analysis:

1) Is the writer a native speaker of English?
No, the writer is likely not a native speaker of English. There are several grammatical errors and awkward phrases that suggest a non-native speaker:

"Does miss teacher" (Incorrect phrasing; "Miss" should be capitalized and "miss teacher" sounds unnatural.)
"You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me" (Native speakers would more likely use "as perfectly as I do.")
"Admoration" (Likely a misspelling of "admiration.")
"Posessing" (Incorrect spelling; should be "possessing.")
"Noy" (A typo that was probably meant to be "not.")
"Jusy" (A typo likely meant to be "Just.")
These errors are more indicative of someone whose first language isn't English.

2) If not, which nationality?
Determining nationality based solely on language can be challenging. However, based on some patterns and errors in the text, the speaker might be European. The phrases like "Miss teacher," and the reference to "English skills" being common worldwide, could indicate familiarity with English as a second language in a country where English is taught but not the first language. Possibly someone from Western or Central Europe, such as Germany, the Netherlands, or Scandinavia, based on the generally confident but flawed usage of English and the non-native structures.

3) Is the writer well-educated?
The writer appears to have a moderate level of education but not very advanced, at least in terms of language skills. The person makes several spelling mistakes and grammatical errors but is using humor, sarcasm, and some relatively complex ideas ("jealousy is the highest form of admoration"). This indicates some level of sophistication in thought, although the language itself isn't polished. The writer might be educated in a different field where English language precision isn't a primary focus.

4) Is the writer from this century?
Yes, the writer is definitely from this century. The use of internet slang like "rofl lmao," casual tone, and informal emoticons (e.g., ":roll:") are hallmarks of digital-age communication. This style of writing has become prevalent in the 21st century with the rise of social media and instant messaging.

Summary:
Not a native English speaker.
Possibly European (potentially from Western/Central Europe).
Moderately educated but not particularly refined in English.
Definitely from the 21st century.

[Külaline]

I don’t give a damn about mistakes. Does miss teacher want me to write a perfect essay for her ? Yes for you, you deserve to be written according to the highest possible standards rofl lmao

Based on the provided text, here's the analysis:

1) Is the writer a native speaker of English?
No, the writer is likely not a native speaker of English. There are several grammatical errors and awkward phrases that suggest a non-native speaker:

"Does miss teacher" (Incorrect phrasing; "Miss" should be capitalized and "miss teacher" sounds unnatural.)
"You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me" (Native speakers would more likely use "as perfectly as I do.")
"Admoration" (Likely a misspelling of "admiration.")
"Posessing" (Incorrect spelling; should be "possessing.")
"Noy" (A typo that was probably meant to be "not.")
"Jusy" (A typo likely meant to be "Just.")
These errors are more indicative of someone whose first language isn't English.

2) If not, which nationality?
Determining nationality based solely on language can be challenging. However, based on some patterns and errors in the text, the speaker might be European. The phrases like "Miss teacher," and the reference to "English skills" being common worldwide, could indicate familiarity with English as a second language in a country where English is taught but not the first language. Possibly someone from Western or Central Europe, such as Germany, the Netherlands, or Scandinavia, based on the generally confident but flawed usage of English and the non-native structures.

3) Is the writer well-educated?
The writer appears to have a moderate level of education but not very advanced, at least in terms of language skills. The person makes several spelling mistakes and grammatical errors but is using humor, sarcasm, and some relatively complex ideas ("jealousy is the highest form of admoration"). This indicates some level of sophistication in thought, although the language itself isn't polished. The writer might be educated in a different field where English language precision isn't a primary focus.

4) Is the writer from this century?
Yes, the writer is definitely from this century. The use of internet slang like "rofl lmao," casual tone, and informal emoticons (e.g., ":roll:") are hallmarks of digital-age communication. This style of writing has become prevalent in the 21st century with the rise of social media and instant messaging.

Summary:
Not a native English speaker.
Possibly European (potentially from Western/Central Europe).
Moderately educated but not particularly refined in English.
Definitely from the 21st century.

Oh em gee a random person i dont give the slightest sh*t about wants me to speak like a native speaker. Big shocker that someone has mistakes in a language that is not their mother tongue. Thank you for proving that you dont have a anything better to do, than to analyze my random texts in the middle of the night

[Külaline]

I don’t give a damn about mistakes. Does miss teacher want me to write a perfect essay for her ? Yes for you, you deserve to be written according to the highest possible standards rofl lmao

Based on the provided text, here's the analysis:

1) Is the writer a native speaker of English?
No, the writer is likely not a native speaker of English. There are several grammatical errors and awkward phrases that suggest a non-native speaker:

"Does miss teacher" (Incorrect phrasing; "Miss" should be capitalized and "miss teacher" sounds unnatural.)
"You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me" (Native speakers would more likely use "as perfectly as I do.")
"Admoration" (Likely a misspelling of "admiration.")
"Posessing" (Incorrect spelling; should be "possessing.")
"Noy" (A typo that was probably meant to be "not.")
"Jusy" (A typo likely meant to be "Just.")
These errors are more indicative of someone whose first language isn't English.

2) If not, which nationality?
Determining nationality based solely on language can be challenging. However, based on some patterns and errors in the text, the speaker might be European. The phrases like "Miss teacher," and the reference to "English skills" being common worldwide, could indicate familiarity with English as a second language in a country where English is taught but not the first language. Possibly someone from Western or Central Europe, such as Germany, the Netherlands, or Scandinavia, based on the generally confident but flawed usage of English and the non-native structures.

3) Is the writer well-educated?
The writer appears to have a moderate level of education but not very advanced, at least in terms of language skills. The person makes several spelling mistakes and grammatical errors but is using humor, sarcasm, and some relatively complex ideas ("jealousy is the highest form of admoration"). This indicates some level of sophistication in thought, although the language itself isn't polished. The writer might be educated in a different field where English language precision isn't a primary focus.

4) Is the writer from this century?
Yes, the writer is definitely from this century. The use of internet slang like "rofl lmao," casual tone, and informal emoticons (e.g., ":roll:") are hallmarks of digital-age communication. This style of writing has become prevalent in the 21st century with the rise of social media and instant messaging.

Summary:
Not a native English speaker.
Possibly European (potentially from Western/Central Europe).
Moderately educated but not particularly refined in English.
Definitely from the 21st century.

1 Based on the text, it's difficult to determine definitively if the person is a native speaker. While the language is fluent, there are a few minor errors and awkward phrasings ("wouldnt dream of being impressed by" instead of "wouldn’t be impressed by"). These could suggest either a highly proficient non-native speaker or a native speaker who might not be carefully proofreading their text. The content suggests confidence in their English skills, which could imply either scenario.

2 Based on the text, it's difficult to determine definitively if the person is a native speaker. While the language is fluent, there are a few minor errors and awkward phrasings ("wouldnt dream of being impressed by" instead of "wouldn’t be impressed by"). These could suggest either a highly proficient non-native speaker or a native speaker who might not be carefully proofreading their text. The content suggests confidence in their English skills, which could imply either scenario.


highly proficient mwuah

[Külaline]

I don’t give a damn about mistakes. Does miss teacher want me to write a perfect essay for her ? Yes for you, you deserve to be written according to the highest possible standards rofl lmao

Based on the provided text, here's the analysis:

1) Is the writer a native speaker of English?
No, the writer is likely not a native speaker of English. There are several grammatical errors and awkward phrases that suggest a non-native speaker:

"Does miss teacher" (Incorrect phrasing; "Miss" should be capitalized and "miss teacher" sounds unnatural.)
"You probably wish to speak it as perfectly as me" (Native speakers would more likely use "as perfectly as I do.")
"Admoration" (Likely a misspelling of "admiration.")
"Posessing" (Incorrect spelling; should be "possessing.")
"Noy" (A typo that was probably meant to be "not.")
"Jusy" (A typo likely meant to be "Just.")
These errors are more indicative of someone whose first language isn't English.

2) If not, which nationality?
Determining nationality based solely on language can be challenging. However, based on some patterns and errors in the text, the speaker might be European. The phrases like "Miss teacher," and the reference to "English skills" being common worldwide, could indicate familiarity with English as a second language in a country where English is taught but not the first language. Possibly someone from Western or Central Europe, such as Germany, the Netherlands, or Scandinavia, based on the generally confident but flawed usage of English and the non-native structures.

3) Is the writer well-educated?
The writer appears to have a moderate level of education but not very advanced, at least in terms of language skills. The person makes several spelling mistakes and grammatical errors but is using humor, sarcasm, and some relatively complex ideas ("jealousy is the highest form of admoration"). This indicates some level of sophistication in thought, although the language itself isn't polished. The writer might be educated in a different field where English language precision isn't a primary focus.

4) Is the writer from this century?
Yes, the writer is definitely from this century. The use of internet slang like "rofl lmao," casual tone, and informal emoticons (e.g., ":roll:") are hallmarks of digital-age communication. This style of writing has become prevalent in the 21st century with the rise of social media and instant messaging.

Summary:
Not a native English speaker.
Possibly European (potentially from Western/Central Europe).
Moderately educated but not particularly refined in English.
Definitely from the 21st century.

Based on the texts provided, the person seems to have a good command of English and is likely well-educated, though there are some spelling and grammatical errors. The individual displays a confident, even condescending tone, which suggests they believe themselves to be knowledgeable or superior in some way. Their ability to engage in a nuanced argument and use advanced vocabulary indicates a certain level of education.

However, the presence of spelling mistakes, awkward phrasing, and some misunderstandings of common expressions ("admoraiton" instead of "admiration") might suggest that while they are educated, English might not be their first language, or they might not be meticulous in their writing. This doesn't necessarily detract from their overall education level but could point to areas where they might be less proficient.

[Külaline]

Minu arust on see väga tore, kui inimene oskab keeli. Aga sellegipoolest tundub tobe pudistada mingit eesti-inglise segakeelt. Inglise keelt hakata eestikeelses seltskonnas heast peast rääkima on ka tobe. Aga eriti tobe on see, kui need väljendid ja keel on veel ka vigased.

Kitzberg nimetas selliseid tegelasi Kniks-Mariiheniteks. Kadakasakslased - vigases saksa keelese rääkijad, kes olid maarahva päritolu, kuid tahtsid kuuluda kõrgematesse ühiskonnakihtidesse. Nii et ei midagi uut siin päikese all.

[Külaline]

Kas avastame vanas eas AI-d ja ChatGPT-d või kordame enne kooli algust võõrkeele tundideks?